Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| en:grundlagenhandbuch:massetemperatur [2026/04/10 15:55] – [Modified Model] neelest | en:grundlagenhandbuch:massetemperatur [2026/06/05 20:18] (aktuell) – [Determination of the Average Temperature] deppe2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 18: | Zeile 18: | ||
| ==== Dimensionless characteristics for the temperature estimation ==== | ==== Dimensionless characteristics for the temperature estimation ==== | ||
| - | $$\Theta_0 = \frac{T_0 - T_z}{T_Z} \qquad \xi = \frac{y}{h} \qquad \zeta = \frac{z}{Z}$$ | + | $$\Theta_0 = \frac{T_0 - T_z}{T_Z} \qquad \xi = \frac{y}{h} \qquad \zeta = \frac{z}{Z}\tag{2}$$ |
| - | $$Br = \frac{(\tau \gamma)_0 \overline{h}^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K v_0^{1+n} \overline{h}^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}$$ | + | $$Br = \frac{(\tau \gamma)_0 \overline{h}^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K v_0^{1+n} \overline{h}^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}\tag{3}$$ |
| + | |||
| + | $$Gz = \frac{c_p \rho \overline{h} V}{\lambda \overline{b} Z k}\tag{4}$$ | ||
| - | $$Gz = \frac{c_p \rho \overline{h} V}{\lambda \overline{b} Z k}$$ | ||
| With the introduction of the dimensionless characteristics described in table follows: | With the introduction of the dimensionless characteristics described in table follows: | ||
| - | $$Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + Br \cdot e^{-\beta T_z \Theta} \tag{2}$$ | + | $$Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + Br \cdot e^{-\beta T_z \Theta} \tag{5}$$ |
| Due to the exponential function, the differential equation can no longer be solved. In [[en: | Due to the exponential function, the differential equation can no longer be solved. In [[en: | ||
| - | $$e^{-\beta(T-T_0)} = c_1 - c_2 \beta (T - T_0) \tag{3}$$ | + | $$e^{-\beta(T-T_0)} = c_1 - c_2 \beta (T - T_0) \tag{6}$$ |
| This will be shown in the figure. | This will be shown in the figure. | ||
| Zeile 37: | Zeile 38: | ||
| **Figure:** Approximation of the exponential function through a set of linear equations [[en: | **Figure:** Approximation of the exponential function through a set of linear equations [[en: | ||
| - | If one assumes the estimation to be performed in small sections then the simplifications are possible. In small sections it can be assumed that the difference in the temperature in the channel direction is small and therefore the equation | + | If one assumes the estimation to be performed in small sections then the simplifications are possible. In small sections it can be assumed that the difference in the temperature in the channel direction is small and therefore the equation |
| - | $$\beta \Delta T \to 0 \tag{4}$$ | + | $$\beta \Delta T \to 0 \tag{7}$$ |
| - | From this equation | + | From this equation |
| - | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = -Br \tag{5}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = -Br \tag{8}$$ |
| This differential equation was solved in [[en: | This differential equation was solved in [[en: | ||
| Zeile 59: | Zeile 60: | ||
| ==== Solution for the temperature estimation ==== | ==== Solution for the temperature estimation ==== | ||
| - | $$\Theta(\zeta, | + | $$\Theta(\zeta, |
| - | $$\bar{\Theta} = \frac{\bar{T} - T_Z}{T_Z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta, | + | $$\bar{\Theta} = \frac{\bar{T} - T_Z}{T_Z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta, |
| In every heating zone a constant wall temperature is imposed. The temperature calculation starts at the point where the first melt is found. This is the place of the first melt pool formation, at the start of the melting respectively. | In every heating zone a constant wall temperature is imposed. The temperature calculation starts at the point where the first melt is found. This is the place of the first melt pool formation, at the start of the melting respectively. | ||
| Zeile 67: | Zeile 68: | ||
| The average start temperature $\bar{\Theta}_{Start}$ is calculated using the energy equation for the melt layer on the barrel wall. The energy equation for the melt layer on the barrel wall is [[en: | The average start temperature $\bar{\Theta}_{Start}$ is calculated using the energy equation for the melt layer on the barrel wall. The energy equation for the melt layer on the barrel wall is [[en: | ||
| - | $$\lambda_s \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \tau_{yi} \frac{\partial v_j}{\partial y} = 0 \tag{6}$$ | + | $$\lambda_s \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \tau_{yi} \frac{\partial v_j}{\partial y} = 0 \tag{11}$$ |
| With the boundary conditions $T(0) = T_{Fl}$ und $T(\delta) = T_Z$ one reaches the following solution: | With the boundary conditions $T(0) = T_{Fl}$ und $T(\delta) = T_Z$ one reaches the following solution: | ||
| - | $$T(\xi) = T_{Fl} + (T_Z - T_{Fl}) \left\{\xi + Br \left[\frac{1}{A^2}\left(\frac{A}{e^A - 1}\right)^{1+n}\left(1 - e^{A\xi} - \xi(1 - e^A)\right)\right]\right\} \tag{7}$$ | + | $$T(\xi) = T_{Fl} + (T_Z - T_{Fl}) \left\{\xi + Br \left[\frac{1}{A^2}\left(\frac{A}{e^A - 1}\right)^{1+n}\left(1 - e^{A\xi} - \xi(1 - e^A)\right)\right]\right\} \tag{12}$$ |
| with: | with: | ||
| - | $$Br = \frac{K(T_{Fl})v_{rel}^{1+n} \overline{\delta}^{1-n}}{\lambda_s (T_Z - T_{Fl})} \tag{8}$$ | + | $$Br = \frac{K(T_{Fl})v_{rel}^{1+n} \overline{\delta}^{1-n}}{\lambda_s (T_Z - T_{Fl})} \tag{13}$$ |
| and | and | ||
| - | $$\xi = \frac{y}{\delta} \tag{9}$$ | + | $$\xi = \frac{y}{\delta} \tag{14}$$ |
| - | $$A = \frac{\beta(T_Z - T_{Fl})}{n} \tag{10}$$ | + | $$A = \frac{\beta(T_Z - T_{Fl})}{n} \tag{15}$$ |
| From it we get the average temperature for the melt layer under the consideration of the velocity profile: | From it we get the average temperature for the melt layer under the consideration of the velocity profile: | ||
| - | $$\bar{T} = T_{Start} = \frac{\int_0^1 v(\xi)T(\xi)d\xi}{\int_0^1 v(\xi)d\xi} \tag{11}$$ | + | $$\bar{T} = T_{Start} = \frac{\int_0^1 v(\xi)T(\xi)d\xi}{\int_0^1 v(\xi)d\xi} \tag{16}$$ |
| and | and | ||
| - | $$v(\xi) = v_{rel} \frac{e^{A\xi} - 1}{e^A - 1} \tag{12}$$ | + | $$v(\xi) = v_{rel} \frac{e^{A\xi} - 1}{e^A - 1} \tag{17}$$ |
| ==== Equations to estimate the average starting temperature ==== | ==== Equations to estimate the average starting temperature ==== | ||
| - | $$T_{Start} = [B \Delta T(A - 1)2e^{2A} - (AB \Delta T e^{2A} + A_3 - A2)]A_4$$ | + | $$T_{Start} = [B \Delta T(A - 1)2e^{2A} - (AB \Delta T e^{2A} + A_3 - A2)]A_4\tag{18}$$ |
| - | $$B = Br \frac{1}{A^2} \left[\frac{A}{e^A - 1}\right]^{1+n} \qquad \Delta T = T_Z - T_{Fl} A = \frac{\beta}{n} \Delta T$$ | + | $$B = Br \frac{1}{A^2} \left[\frac{A}{e^A - 1}\right]^{1+n} \qquad \Delta T = T_Z - T_{Fl} A = \frac{\beta}{n} \Delta T\tag{19}$$ |
| - | $$A_1 = A^2(B + 1) + 3AB + 2(B - 1)$$ | + | $$A_1 = A^2(B + 1) + 3AB + 2(B - 1)\tag{20}$$ |
| - | $$A_2 = [\Delta T(A(B + 1) + 2B - 1) + AT_{Fl}]2e^A$$ | + | $$A_2 = [\Delta T(A(B + 1) + 2B - 1) + AT_{Fl}]2e^A\tag{21}$$ |
| - | $$A_3 = A^2B \Delta T e^A + \Delta T A_1 + 2AT_{Fl}(A + 1)$$ | + | $$A_3 = A^2B \Delta T e^A + \Delta T A_1 + 2AT_{Fl}(A + 1)\tag{22}$$ |
| - | $$A_4 = \frac{1}{2A(e^A - A - 1)}$$ | + | $$A_4 = \frac{1}{2A(e^A - A - 1)}\tag{23}$$ |
| As Solution one obtains the equations, which are listed in the table. The average temperature for the melt layer is the same as that of the average temperature for the temperature flow estimation. Under the assumption $Br = 0$ the average starting temperature can be solved with the simple solution [[en: | As Solution one obtains the equations, which are listed in the table. The average temperature for the melt layer is the same as that of the average temperature for the temperature flow estimation. Under the assumption $Br = 0$ the average starting temperature can be solved with the simple solution [[en: | ||
| - | $$\bar{T}_{\mathrm{start}} = T_{\mathrm{Fl}} + (T_Z - T_{\mathrm{Fl}}) \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{A} - 1 + e^A \left(1 - \frac{1}{A}\right)}{e^A - A - 1}$$ | + | $$\bar{T}_{\mathrm{start}} = T_{\mathrm{Fl}} + (T_Z - T_{\mathrm{Fl}}) \cdot \frac{\frac{1}{A} - 1 + e^A \left(1 - \frac{1}{A}\right)}{e^A - A - 1}\tag{24}$$ |
| ===== Modified Model ===== | ===== Modified Model ===== | ||
| Zeile 123: | Zeile 124: | ||
| $$\rho \cdot c \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v_x \frac{\partial T}{\partial x} + v_y \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} + v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} \right) = \left( \frac{\partial \dot{q}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_z}{\partial z} \right) $$ | $$\rho \cdot c \left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v_x \frac{\partial T}{\partial x} + v_y \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} + v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} \right) = \left( \frac{\partial \dot{q}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_z}{\partial z} \right) $$ | ||
| $$- T \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T} \right)_{\rho} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z} \right) - \left[ \tau_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \tau_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \tau_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} \right] $$ | $$- T \left( \frac{\partial p}{\partial T} \right)_{\rho} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z} \right) - \left[ \tau_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \tau_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \tau_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} \right] $$ | ||
| - | $$- \left[ \tau_{xy} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} \right) + \tau_{zx} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} \right) + \tau_{zy} \left( \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y} \right) \right] \tag{1}$$ | + | $$- \left[ \tau_{xy} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} \right) + \tau_{zx} \left( \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} \right) + \tau_{zy} \left( \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y} \right) \right] \tag{25}$$ |
| Zeile 140: | Zeile 141: | ||
| Under these assumptions the energy equation simplifies to: | Under these assumptions the energy equation simplifies to: | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \bar{v}_{0z}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{ ({\tau} \cdot {\gamma})_j }}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \bar{v}_{0z}} \cdot e^{-\beta (T - T_j)} \tag{2}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \bar{v}_{0z}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{ ({\tau} \cdot {\gamma})_j }}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \bar{v}_{0z}} \cdot e^{-\beta (T - T_j)} \tag{26}$$ |
| For the heat flow the Fourier' | For the heat flow the Fourier' | ||
| - | $$\dot{q}_y = -\lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} \tag{3}$$ | + | $$\dot{q}_y = -\lambda \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} \tag{27}$$ |
| Is the differential equation standardized, | Is the differential equation standardized, | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta T_z \Theta} \tag{4}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta T_z \Theta} \tag{28}$$ |
| **Table:** Dimensionless factors for the temperature estimation. | **Table:** Dimensionless factors for the temperature estimation. | ||
| Zeile 160: | Zeile 161: | ||
| | $ Gz $ | $ \frac{ c \cdot \rho \cdot \bar{h} \cdot \dot{V}_{z} }{ \lambda \bar{b} \Delta z } $ | | | $ Gz $ | $ \frac{ c \cdot \rho \cdot \bar{h} \cdot \dot{V}_{z} }{ \lambda \bar{b} \Delta z } $ | | ||
| - | Due to the exponential term the partial differential equation | + | Due to the exponential term the partial differential equation |
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \cdot (C_1 - C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta) \tag{5}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \cdot (C_1 - C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta) \tag{29}$$ |
| The factors $C_1$ and $C_2$ are defined in [[en: | The factors $C_1$ and $C_2$ are defined in [[en: | ||
| Zeile 168: | Zeile 169: | ||
| ==== The Channel Area ==== | ==== The Channel Area ==== | ||
| - | For the resolution of the equation | + | For the resolution of the equation |
| For the resolution of the differential equation it is assumed that the temperature differences in an interval $\Delta z$ are diminutive. The temperature equalization processes, which are to be expected in direction of the screw channel depth, are therefore approximately constant and almost independent of the z-coordinate for a certain calculation section. | For the resolution of the differential equation it is assumed that the temperature differences in an interval $\Delta z$ are diminutive. The temperature equalization processes, which are to be expected in direction of the screw channel depth, are therefore approximately constant and almost independent of the z-coordinate for a certain calculation section. | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} \approx \frac{\partial^2 \Theta_0}{\partial \xi^2} \tag{1}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} \approx \frac{\partial^2 \Theta_0}{\partial \xi^2} \tag{30}$$ |
| - | Consequently, | + | Consequently, |
| - | $$\Theta_0 = \Theta_z + (K_1 + K_2) \cdot \xi^2 + K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6 \tag{2}$$ | + | $$\Theta_0 = \Theta_z + (K_1 + K_2) \cdot \xi^2 + K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6 \tag{31}$$ |
| The following boundary conditions were applied for the resolution of the differential equation: | The following boundary conditions were applied for the resolution of the differential equation: | ||
| - | * Heat transfer to the screw does not take place: $\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = 0$ für $\xi = 0 \tag{3}$ | + | * Heat transfer to the screw does not take place: $\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = 0$ für $\xi = 0$ |
| * A predetermined temperature $T_{z}$ is found at the barrel wall: | * A predetermined temperature $T_{z}$ is found at the barrel wall: | ||
| - | $$\Theta(\zeta, | + | $$\Theta(\zeta, |
| * The medium melt temperature is known at the beginning of the calculation section: | * The medium melt temperature is known at the beginning of the calculation section: | ||
| - | $$\int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta = 0, \xi) \cdot d \xi = \frac{T_0 - T_0}{T_z} = 0 \tag{5}$$ | + | $$\int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta = 0, \xi) \cdot d \xi = \frac{T_0 - T_0}{T_z} = 0 \tag{33}$$ |
| - | From this the following solution of equation | + | From this the following solution of equation |
| $$\Theta(\zeta, | $$\Theta(\zeta, | ||
| - | $$+ (\Theta_z + (K_1 - K_2) \cdot \xi^2 +) \cdot K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6) \cdot \varepsilon \tag{6}$$ | + | $$+ (\Theta_z + (K_1 - K_2) \cdot \xi^2 +) \cdot K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6) \cdot \varepsilon \tag{34}$$ |
| with | with | ||
| - | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{7}$$ | + | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{35}$$ |
| - | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{8}$$ | + | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{36}$$ |
| The medium temperature in the channel is calculated with: | The medium temperature in the channel is calculated with: | ||
| - | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(-\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \zeta\right)} \tag{9}$$ | + | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(-\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \zeta\right)} \tag{37}$$ |
| - | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{\overline{T} - T_0}{T_z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\xi, \zeta) \cdot d \xi \tag{10}$$ | + | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{\overline{T} - T_0}{T_z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\xi, \zeta) \cdot d \xi \tag{38}$$ |
| This results in: | This results in: | ||
| Zeile 212: | Zeile 213: | ||
| $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | ||
| - | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{11}$$ | + | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{39}$$ |
| For a first verification the model predictions were confronted with the results of non-isothermal flow simulations. The figure exhibits the comparison of the medium temperatures. An improvement of the description quality can be observed here as compared to the models published so far. | For a first verification the model predictions were confronted with the results of non-isothermal flow simulations. The figure exhibits the comparison of the medium temperatures. An improvement of the description quality can be observed here as compared to the models published so far. | ||
| Zeile 230: | Zeile 231: | ||
| The temperature increase in the radial clearance and in the grooves can be calculated with the same approach as the one, with which the temperature increase is determined in the channel. | The temperature increase in the radial clearance and in the grooves can be calculated with the same approach as the one, with which the temperature increase is determined in the channel. | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot q}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{(\tau \cdot \dot{\gamma})}_j}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot e^{-\beta(T-T_i)} \tag{1}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot q}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{(\tau \cdot \dot{\gamma})}_j}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot e^{-\beta(T-T_i)} \tag{40}$$ |
| Is the differential equation standardized, | Is the differential equation standardized, | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta} \tag{2}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta} \tag{41}$$ |
| The resolution of the differential equation is performed analogous to chapter The Channel Area. One receives: | The resolution of the differential equation is performed analogous to chapter The Channel Area. One receives: | ||
| Zeile 240: | Zeile 241: | ||
| $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | ||
| - | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{3}$$ | + | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{42}$$ |
| with: | with: | ||
| - | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{4}$$ | + | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{43}$$ |
| - | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{5}$$ | + | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{44}$$ |
| and: | and: | ||
| - | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \cdot \zeta\right)} \tag{6}$$ | + | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \cdot \zeta\right)} \tag{45}$$ |
| **Dimensionless factors for the temperature calculation in the radial clearance and in the grooves:** | **Dimensionless factors for the temperature calculation in the radial clearance and in the grooves:** | ||
| Zeile 264: | Zeile 265: | ||
| ==== Determination of the Average Temperature ==== | ==== Determination of the Average Temperature ==== | ||
| - | The coupling of the temperature calculations in the channel area and the clearance area [[en: | + | The coupling of the temperature calculations in the channel area and the clearance area [[en: |
| - | {{ : | + | {{ :en: |
| **Figure:** Control room for the enthalpy balance to calculate the medium temperature. | **Figure:** Control room for the enthalpy balance to calculate the medium temperature. | ||
| Zeile 272: | Zeile 273: | ||
| The enthalpy change in the control room corresponds with the difference between the inflowing and the outflowing enthalpy: | The enthalpy change in the control room corresponds with the difference between the inflowing and the outflowing enthalpy: | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, |
| The alteration results from the temperature increase in the channel plus the enthalpy change of the flows in the radial clearance and in the grooves. | The alteration results from the temperature increase in the channel plus the enthalpy change of the flows in the radial clearance and in the grooves. | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, |
| with: | with: | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgap} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_x \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgap} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_x \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, |
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgroove} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_{groove} \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgroove} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_{groove} \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, |
| $\overline{T_{z01, | $\overline{T_{z01, | ||
| - | $$\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\overline{T_{z01, |
| Is it simplifyingly assumed that the isotherms run at right angle to the screw axis, the medium temperature in the neighboring channel $\overline{T_{z01, | Is it simplifyingly assumed that the isotherms run at right angle to the screw axis, the medium temperature in the neighboring channel $\overline{T_{z01, | ||
| - | $$\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\overline{T_{z01, |
| The overall temperature increase in the interval $[z_0, z_1]$ thus calculates to: | The overall temperature increase in the interval $[z_0, z_1]$ thus calculates to: | ||
| - | $$T_{z_1} = \frac{\dot{H}_{z_i}}{c \cdot \rho \cdot \dot{V}_z} \tag{7}$$ | + | $$T_{z_1} = \frac{\dot{H}_{z_i}}{c \cdot \rho \cdot \dot{V}_z} \tag{52}$$ |
| with | with | ||
| - | $$\dot{H}_{z_i} = \Delta \dot{H}_{z_{0, | + | $$\dot{H}_{z_i} = \Delta \dot{H}_{z_{0, |
| one eventually receives the following equation for the calculation of the temperature development: | one eventually receives the following equation for the calculation of the temperature development: | ||
| - | $$T_{z_1} = T_{z1, | + | $$T_{z_1} = T_{z1, |
| First experiments for the verification of the temperature model were performed with a twin screw extruder of the ZSK 30 type. A polypropylene (PP 1100H) served as the experimental medium. The polymer was plasticated in a subsidiary extruder and laterally conveyed into the twin screw extruder (see figure). | First experiments for the verification of the temperature model were performed with a twin screw extruder of the ZSK 30 type. A polypropylene (PP 1100H) served as the experimental medium. The polymer was plasticated in a subsidiary extruder and laterally conveyed into the twin screw extruder (see figure). | ||
| Zeile 309: | Zeile 310: | ||
| It can be recognized that the model is in a position to describe the experimental results with sufficient accuracy. | It can be recognized that the model is in a position to describe the experimental results with sufficient accuracy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| **Figure:** Comparison of measured and calculated melt temperatures in thread elements. | **Figure:** Comparison of measured and calculated melt temperatures in thread elements. | ||
| Zeile 316: | Zeile 319: | ||
| The energy equation for the calculation of the radial temperature profile in the screw flight forms the basis for the 2D model. | The energy equation for the calculation of the radial temperature profile in the screw flight forms the basis for the 2D model. | ||
| - | $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v \nabla T\right) = \lambda \nabla^2 T + \tau \nabla v \tag{Equation 1}$$ | + | $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v \nabla T\right) = \lambda \nabla^2 T + \tau \nabla v \tag{55}$$ |
| A modification of the energy equation to match the existing open system, which exchanges the energy and the mass with the environment, | A modification of the energy equation to match the existing open system, which exchanges the energy and the mass with the environment, | ||
| - | The cylinder moves as an ideally formed plate over the rigid screw, so that one can resort back to a pan model with kinematic reversal. The different diction for Cartesian coordinates results in the following function for the energy equation with the aforementioned geometry. [[en: | + | The cylinder moves as an ideally formed plate over the rigid screw, so that one can resort back to a pan model with kinematic reversal. The different diction for Cartesian coordinates results in the following function for the energy equation with the aforementioned geometry [[en: |
| $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v_x \frac{\partial T}{\partial x} + v_y \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} + v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right) = -\left(\frac{\partial \dot{q}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_z}{\partial z}\right)$$ | $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v_x \frac{\partial T}{\partial x} + v_y \frac{\partial T}{\partial y} + v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right) = -\left(\frac{\partial \dot{q}_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \dot{q}_z}{\partial z}\right)$$ | ||
| Zeile 326: | Zeile 329: | ||
| $$-T \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_V \left(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) - \left(\sigma_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \sigma_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \sigma_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) $$ | $$-T \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_V \left(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) - \left(\sigma_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \sigma_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \sigma_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) $$ | ||
| - | $$-\left[\tau_{xy} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}\right) + \tau_{xz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\right) + \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\right]\tag{Equation 2}$$ | + | $$-\left[\tau_{xy} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}\right) + \tau_{xz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\right) + \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\right]\tag{56}$$ |
| - | The equation consists of five terms, which have the following meanings [[en: | + | The equation consists of five terms, which have the following meanings [[en: |
| * The left side equates to the change of the internal energy per unit of time and volume | * The left side equates to the change of the internal energy per unit of time and volume | ||
| Zeile 337: | Zeile 340: | ||
| As to obtain an analytic result, the equation must be simplified with further model assumptions. Apart from the viscosity, all material parameters are presumed temperature independent. | As to obtain an analytic result, the equation must be simplified with further model assumptions. Apart from the viscosity, all material parameters are presumed temperature independent. | ||
| - | In addition to the aforementioned ones, further assumptions are also made [[en: | + | In addition to the aforementioned ones, further assumptions are also made [[en: |
| * The flow is stationary and laminarily following ($\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = 0$) | * The flow is stationary and laminarily following ($\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = 0$) | ||
| Zeile 347: | Zeile 350: | ||
| * Normal stresses are also neglectable ($\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy} = \sigma_{zz} = 0$) | * Normal stresses are also neglectable ($\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy} = \sigma_{zz} = 0$) | ||
| - | With the help of the simplifying criteria the equation | + | With the help of the simplifying criteria the equation |
| - | $$\rho c v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} - \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\tag{Equation 3}$$ | + | $$\rho c v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} - \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\tag{57}$$ |
| The sum of thermal conduction in the flight height and the energy of the dissipation results in the temperature rising lengthways in the canal, which is filled with polymer melt. | The sum of thermal conduction in the flight height and the energy of the dissipation results in the temperature rising lengthways in the canal, which is filled with polymer melt. | ||
| - | Under consideration of the Fourier thermal conductivity approach for the heat flow in direction of the flight height and the power flow law for non-newtonian flow behavior of polymer melt with the Arrehnius-approach, | + | Under consideration of the Fourier thermal conductivity approach for the heat flow in direction of the flight height and the power flow law for non-newtonian flow behavior of polymer melt with the Arrehnius-approach, |
| - | $$\rho c \bar{v}_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 e^{-\beta(T-T_0)}\tag{Equation 4}$$ | + | $$\rho c \bar{v}_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 e^{-\beta(T-T_0)}\tag{58}$$ |
| - | To simplify the energy equation further, the dimensionless operating figures as described in [[grundlagenhandbuch: | + | To simplify the energy equation further, the dimensionless operating figures as described in [[en:grundlagenhandbuch: |
| - | $$Br = \frac{\left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 h^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K_{0T} v_0^{1+n} h^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}\tag{Equation 5}$$ | + | $$Br = \frac{\left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 h^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K_{0T} v_0^{1+n} h^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}\tag{59}$$ |
| - | $$Gz = \frac{c \rho \bar{v}_z h^2}{\lambda \Delta z} = \frac{c \rho h}{\lambda b \Delta z} \dot{V}\tag{Equation 6}$$ | + | $$Gz = \frac{c \rho \bar{v}_z h^2}{\lambda \Delta z} = \frac{c \rho h}{\lambda b \Delta z} \dot{V}\tag{60}$$ |
| - | $$\Theta = \frac{T - T_0}{T_Z}\tag{Equation 7}$$ | + | $$\Theta = \frac{T - T_0}{T_Z}\tag{61}$$ |
| - | $$\xi = \frac{\Delta y}{h}\tag{Equation 8}$$ | + | $$\xi = \frac{\Delta y}{h}\tag{62}$$ |
| - | $$\zeta = \frac{\Delta z}{l}\tag{Equation 9}$$ | + | $$\zeta = \frac{\Delta z}{l}\tag{63}$$ |
| During the geometric calculation of the Graetz- $Gr$ and Brinkmann-number $Br$ some twin screw-specific adjustments are made. For the ascertainment of the Graetz-number $Gr$ the flight height $h$ and the flight width $br$ are important. These two sizes are defined using the average flight height $\bar{h}$ and the flight width $b_{max}$ of the twin screw extruder. | During the geometric calculation of the Graetz- $Gr$ and Brinkmann-number $Br$ some twin screw-specific adjustments are made. For the ascertainment of the Graetz-number $Gr$ the flight height $h$ and the flight width $br$ are important. These two sizes are defined using the average flight height $\bar{h}$ and the flight width $b_{max}$ of the twin screw extruder. | ||
| - | For the Brinkmann-number $Br$ the viscosity $\eta$ is needed, this depends on the shear rate $\dot{\gamma}$ and is influenced by the geometry of the twin screw extruder. As there is no constant flight height $h$ in the canal, the average flight height $\bar{h}$ is used to calculate the average shear rate $\overline{\dot{\gamma}}$. Without considering the influence of the characteristics of the screw element (mixing elements, Shear elements etc.), [[en: | + | For the Brinkmann-number $Br$ the viscosity $\eta$ is needed, this depends on the shear rate $\dot{\gamma}$ and is influenced by the geometry of the twin screw extruder. As there is no constant flight height $h$ in the canal, the average flight height $\bar{h}$ is used to calculate the average shear rate $\overline{\dot{\gamma}}$. Without considering the influence of the characteristics of the screw element (mixing elements, Shear elements etc.) [[en: |
| - | $$\overline{\dot{\gamma}} = \frac{\bar{h}}{v_0}\tag{Equation 10}$$ | + | $$\overline{\dot{\gamma}} = \frac{\bar{h}}{v_0}\tag{64}$$ |
| The function for the calculation of the temperature in the melt-filled canal, assumes the following shape: | The function for the calculation of the temperature in the melt-filled canal, assumes the following shape: | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = \frac{1}{Gz} \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right]\tag{Equation 11}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = \frac{1}{Gz} \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right]\tag{65}$$ |
| It is not possible yet, to solve the, as the exponential term is dependent on the temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$. In the following equation the exponential term is partly linearized. | It is not possible yet, to solve the, as the exponential term is dependent on the temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$. In the following equation the exponential term is partly linearized. | ||
| - | $$\exp\left[-\beta(T - T_0)\right] = \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right] = c_1 - c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta\tag{Equation 12}$$ | + | $$\exp\left[-\beta(T - T_0)\right] = \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right] = c_1 - c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta\tag{66}$$ |
| This linear equation divides the exponential term into two parts. The first part is dependent on the radial temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$ ($c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta$) and the second is dependent on $T$ or rather $\Theta$ and $c_1$. The two unknown parameters $c_1$ and $c_2$ are calculated in two equations, which approach the exponential function with a secant which lies between the average radial temperature of the previous section $T_0$ and the cylinder wall temperature $T_Z$. | This linear equation divides the exponential term into two parts. The first part is dependent on the radial temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$ ($c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta$) and the second is dependent on $T$ or rather $\Theta$ and $c_1$. The two unknown parameters $c_1$ and $c_2$ are calculated in two equations, which approach the exponential function with a secant which lies between the average radial temperature of the previous section $T_0$ and the cylinder wall temperature $T_Z$. | ||
| Zeile 389: | Zeile 392: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | **Image 1:** approach of exponential function using a secant [[en: | + | **Image 1:** approach of exponential function using a secant [[en: |
| - | In summary, the linearization with the Equation 10 produces the analytically solvable, simplified energy equation for the radial temperature (for $0 \leq \xi \leq 1$ and $0 \leq \zeta \leq 1$) [[en: | + | In summary, the linearization with the Equation 10 produces the analytically solvable, simplified energy equation for the radial temperature (for $0 \leq \xi \leq 1$ and $0 \leq \zeta \leq 1$) [[en: |
| - | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} - c_2 \beta T_Z Br \Theta = -c_1 Br\tag{Equation 13}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} - c_2 \beta T_Z Br \Theta = -c_1 Br\tag{67}$$ |
| - | The presented differential equation was successfully solved with the marginal conditions of the constant cylinder temperature and a tempered screw in the elaboration of [[en: | + | The presented differential equation was successfully solved with the marginal conditions of the constant cylinder temperature and a tempered screw in the elaboration of [[en: |
| This can be done using the following equation and results in the ten data of the profile of the flight height. | This can be done using the following equation and results in the ten data of the profile of the flight height. | ||
| - | $$T_{0, | + | $$T_{0, |
| Finally the arithmetic mean is formed from the radial temperature data and the average canal temperature of the section is defined. Because of the step-by-step calculation in SIGMA the axial temperature curve can be calculated. | Finally the arithmetic mean is formed from the radial temperature data and the average canal temperature of the section is defined. Because of the step-by-step calculation in SIGMA the axial temperature curve can be calculated. | ||
| Zeile 405: | Zeile 408: | ||
| ===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
| - | [1] Potente, H.: Rechnergestützte Extruderauslegung, | + | [Ang10] Anger, K.: „Temperaturmodellierung |
| - | + | ||
| - | [2] Koch, M.: Berechnung und Auslegung | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | [3] Schulte, H.: Grundlagen zur verfahrenstechnischen Auslegung von Spritzgießplastifiziereinheiten, | + | |
| - | [4] Stenzel, H.; Ansahl, J.: Zur Temperaturberechnung in Ein- und Doppelschneckenextrudern, Universität Paderborn, | + | [Ans93] Ansahl, J.: Grundlagen für die Auslegung dichtkämmender Gleichdrall-Doppelschneckenextruder, |
| - | [5] Carslaw, H. S.; Jaeger, J. C.: Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959. | + | [CJ59] Carslaw, H.S.; Jaeger, J.C.: |
| - | [6] Tadmor, Z.; Klein, I.: Engineering Principles of Plasticating Extrusion, Publishing Company, Huntington, NY, 1978. | + | [Koc87] Koch, M.: Berechnung und Auslegung von Nutbuchsenextrudern, Dissertation, Universität Paderborn, 1987 |
| - | [7] Melisch, U.: „Grundlagen zur Simulation | + | [Kre04] Kretschmer, K.: „Untersuchung und Beschreibung |
| - | [8] Ansahl, J.: Grundlagen | + | [Mel98] Melisch, U.: |
| - | [9] Mitterfellner, | + | [Mit91] Mitterfellner, |
| - | [10] Stenzel, H.: Grundlagen zur Verfahrenstechnischen Auslegung von Barriereschnecken in Glattrohr- und Nutbuchsenextrudern, Dissertation, Universität | + | [Pot91] Potente, H.: Rechnergestützte Extruderauslegung, Kunststofftechnisches Seminar, Paderborn, |
| - | [11] Kretschmer, K.: Untersuchung und Beschreibung des Prozess- und Mischverhaltens von Mischelementen | + | [PS92] Potente H.; Schöppner V.: „Skript zur Vorlesung Rechnergestützte Extruderauslegung„; |
| - | [Ang10] Anger, K.: „// | + | [SA90] Stenzel, H.; Ansahl, J.: Zur Temperaturberechnung in Ein- und Doppelschneckenextrudern, |
| - | [Sch13] Schadomsky, M.: „//Weiterentwicklung eines mathematischen Modells zur Bestimmung der Temperaturverteilung intern temperierter Einschneckenextruder//"; Studienarbeit am Institut für Kunststofftechnik (KTP) ; Universität Paderborn; 2013 | + | [Sch13] Schadomsky, M.: „Weiterentwicklung eines mathematischen Modells zur Bestimmung der Temperaturverteilung intern temperierter Einschneckenextruder“; Studienarbeit am Institut für Kunststofftechnik (KTP) ; 2013 |
| - | [PS92] Potente | + | [Sch90] Schulte, |
| - | [Kre04] Kretschmer, K.: „// | + | [Ste92] Stenzel, H.: Grundlagen zur Verfahrenstechnischen Auslegung |
| + | [TK78] Tadmor, Z.; Klein, I.: | ||