Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende ÜberarbeitungNächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| en:grundlagenhandbuch:massetemperatur [2026/05/24 17:12] – [Modified Model] neelest | en:grundlagenhandbuch:massetemperatur [2026/06/05 20:18] (aktuell) – [Determination of the Average Temperature] deppe2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 169: | Zeile 169: | ||
| ==== The Channel Area ==== | ==== The Channel Area ==== | ||
| - | For the resolution of the equation | + | For the resolution of the equation |
| For the resolution of the differential equation it is assumed that the temperature differences in an interval $\Delta z$ are diminutive. The temperature equalization processes, which are to be expected in direction of the screw channel depth, are therefore approximately constant and almost independent of the z-coordinate for a certain calculation section. | For the resolution of the differential equation it is assumed that the temperature differences in an interval $\Delta z$ are diminutive. The temperature equalization processes, which are to be expected in direction of the screw channel depth, are therefore approximately constant and almost independent of the z-coordinate for a certain calculation section. | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} \approx \frac{\partial^2 \Theta_0}{\partial \xi^2} \tag{1}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} \approx \frac{\partial^2 \Theta_0}{\partial \xi^2} \tag{30}$$ |
| - | Consequently, | + | Consequently, |
| - | $$\Theta_0 = \Theta_z + (K_1 + K_2) \cdot \xi^2 + K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6 \tag{2}$$ | + | $$\Theta_0 = \Theta_z + (K_1 + K_2) \cdot \xi^2 + K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6 \tag{31}$$ |
| The following boundary conditions were applied for the resolution of the differential equation: | The following boundary conditions were applied for the resolution of the differential equation: | ||
| - | * Heat transfer to the screw does not take place: $\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = 0$ für $\xi = 0 \tag{3}$ | + | * Heat transfer to the screw does not take place: $\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = 0$ für $\xi = 0$ |
| * A predetermined temperature $T_{z}$ is found at the barrel wall: | * A predetermined temperature $T_{z}$ is found at the barrel wall: | ||
| - | $$\Theta(\zeta, | + | $$\Theta(\zeta, |
| * The medium melt temperature is known at the beginning of the calculation section: | * The medium melt temperature is known at the beginning of the calculation section: | ||
| - | $$\int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta = 0, \xi) \cdot d \xi = \frac{T_0 - T_0}{T_z} = 0 \tag{5}$$ | + | $$\int_0^1 \Theta(\zeta = 0, \xi) \cdot d \xi = \frac{T_0 - T_0}{T_z} = 0 \tag{33}$$ |
| - | From this the following solution of equation | + | From this the following solution of equation |
| $$\Theta(\zeta, | $$\Theta(\zeta, | ||
| - | $$+ (\Theta_z + (K_1 - K_2) \cdot \xi^2 +) \cdot K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6) \cdot \varepsilon \tag{6}$$ | + | $$+ (\Theta_z + (K_1 - K_2) \cdot \xi^2 +) \cdot K_1 \cdot \xi^4 + K_2 \cdot \xi^6) \cdot \varepsilon \tag{34}$$ |
| with | with | ||
| - | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{7}$$ | + | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{35}$$ |
| - | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{8}$$ | + | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{36}$$ |
| The medium temperature in the channel is calculated with: | The medium temperature in the channel is calculated with: | ||
| - | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(-\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \zeta\right)} \tag{9}$$ | + | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(-\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \zeta\right)} \tag{37}$$ |
| - | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{\overline{T} - T_0}{T_z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\xi, \zeta) \cdot d \xi \tag{10}$$ | + | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{\overline{T} - T_0}{T_z} = \int_0^1 \Theta(\xi, \zeta) \cdot d \xi \tag{38}$$ |
| This results in: | This results in: | ||
| Zeile 213: | Zeile 213: | ||
| $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | ||
| - | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{11}$$ | + | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{39}$$ |
| For a first verification the model predictions were confronted with the results of non-isothermal flow simulations. The figure exhibits the comparison of the medium temperatures. An improvement of the description quality can be observed here as compared to the models published so far. | For a first verification the model predictions were confronted with the results of non-isothermal flow simulations. The figure exhibits the comparison of the medium temperatures. An improvement of the description quality can be observed here as compared to the models published so far. | ||
| Zeile 231: | Zeile 231: | ||
| The temperature increase in the radial clearance and in the grooves can be calculated with the same approach as the one, with which the temperature increase is determined in the channel. | The temperature increase in the radial clearance and in the grooves can be calculated with the same approach as the one, with which the temperature increase is determined in the channel. | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot q}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{(\tau \cdot \dot{\gamma})}_j}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot e^{-\beta(T-T_i)} \tag{1}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial T}{\partial x} = -\frac{1}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot \frac{\partial \dot q}{\partial y} + \frac{\overline{(\tau \cdot \dot{\gamma})}_j}{\rho \cdot c \cdot \overline{v}_{0x}} \cdot e^{-\beta(T-T_i)} \tag{40}$$ |
| Is the differential equation standardized, | Is the differential equation standardized, | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta} \tag{2}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \zeta} = \frac{1}{Gz} \cdot \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} e^{-\beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta} \tag{41}$$ |
| The resolution of the differential equation is performed analogous to chapter The Channel Area. One receives: | The resolution of the differential equation is performed analogous to chapter The Channel Area. One receives: | ||
| Zeile 241: | Zeile 241: | ||
| $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | $$\overline{\Theta} = \frac{K_2 \cdot \varepsilon}{7} + \frac{C_1 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon)}{C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} + \Theta_z \cdot \varepsilon + K_1 \cdot \frac{6 - 6 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{8}{15} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}$$ | ||
| - | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{3}$$ | + | $$+K_2 \cdot \frac{4 - 4 \cdot \varepsilon - \frac{1}{3} \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z} \tag{42}$$ |
| with: | with: | ||
| - | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{4}$$ | + | $$K_1 = -\frac{5}{2} \cdot \frac{147 \cdot (\Theta_z - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (\varepsilon - 1)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{43}$$ |
| - | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{5}$$ | + | $$K_2 = \frac{7}{4} \cdot \frac{105 \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 4 \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot (\varepsilon - 1) + Br \cdot Gz \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z \cdot (4 + 11 \cdot \varepsilon)}{231 \cdot (1 - \varepsilon) + 5 \cdot \varepsilon \cdot Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z \cdot \Theta_z} \tag{44}$$ |
| and: | and: | ||
| - | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \cdot \zeta\right)} \tag{6}$$ | + | $$\varepsilon = e^{\left(\frac{Br \cdot C_2 \cdot \beta \cdot T_z}{Gz} \cdot \zeta\right)} \tag{45}$$ |
| **Dimensionless factors for the temperature calculation in the radial clearance and in the grooves:** | **Dimensionless factors for the temperature calculation in the radial clearance and in the grooves:** | ||
| Zeile 267: | Zeile 267: | ||
| The coupling of the temperature calculations in the channel area and the clearance area [[en: | The coupling of the temperature calculations in the channel area and the clearance area [[en: | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ :en: |
| **Figure:** Control room for the enthalpy balance to calculate the medium temperature. | **Figure:** Control room for the enthalpy balance to calculate the medium temperature. | ||
| Zeile 273: | Zeile 273: | ||
| The enthalpy change in the control room corresponds with the difference between the inflowing and the outflowing enthalpy: | The enthalpy change in the control room corresponds with the difference between the inflowing and the outflowing enthalpy: | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, |
| The alteration results from the temperature increase in the channel plus the enthalpy change of the flows in the radial clearance and in the grooves. | The alteration results from the temperature increase in the channel plus the enthalpy change of the flows in the radial clearance and in the grooves. | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{z_0, |
| with: | with: | ||
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgap} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_x \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgap} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_x \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, |
| - | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgroove} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_{groove} \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\Delta \dot{H}_{zgroove} = \rho \cdot c \cdot \dot{V}_{groove} \cdot (\overline{T_{z01, |
| $\overline{T_{z01, | $\overline{T_{z01, | ||
| - | $$\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\overline{T_{z01, |
| Is it simplifyingly assumed that the isotherms run at right angle to the screw axis, the medium temperature in the neighboring channel $\overline{T_{z01, | Is it simplifyingly assumed that the isotherms run at right angle to the screw axis, the medium temperature in the neighboring channel $\overline{T_{z01, | ||
| - | $$\overline{T_{z01, | + | $$\overline{T_{z01, |
| The overall temperature increase in the interval $[z_0, z_1]$ thus calculates to: | The overall temperature increase in the interval $[z_0, z_1]$ thus calculates to: | ||
| - | $$T_{z_1} = \frac{\dot{H}_{z_i}}{c \cdot \rho \cdot \dot{V}_z} \tag{7}$$ | + | $$T_{z_1} = \frac{\dot{H}_{z_i}}{c \cdot \rho \cdot \dot{V}_z} \tag{52}$$ |
| with | with | ||
| - | $$\dot{H}_{z_i} = \Delta \dot{H}_{z_{0, | + | $$\dot{H}_{z_i} = \Delta \dot{H}_{z_{0, |
| one eventually receives the following equation for the calculation of the temperature development: | one eventually receives the following equation for the calculation of the temperature development: | ||
| - | $$T_{z_1} = T_{z1, | + | $$T_{z_1} = T_{z1, |
| First experiments for the verification of the temperature model were performed with a twin screw extruder of the ZSK 30 type. A polypropylene (PP 1100H) served as the experimental medium. The polymer was plasticated in a subsidiary extruder and laterally conveyed into the twin screw extruder (see figure). | First experiments for the verification of the temperature model were performed with a twin screw extruder of the ZSK 30 type. A polypropylene (PP 1100H) served as the experimental medium. The polymer was plasticated in a subsidiary extruder and laterally conveyed into the twin screw extruder (see figure). | ||
| Zeile 310: | Zeile 310: | ||
| It can be recognized that the model is in a position to describe the experimental results with sufficient accuracy. | It can be recognized that the model is in a position to describe the experimental results with sufficient accuracy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| **Figure:** Comparison of measured and calculated melt temperatures in thread elements. | **Figure:** Comparison of measured and calculated melt temperatures in thread elements. | ||
| Zeile 317: | Zeile 319: | ||
| The energy equation for the calculation of the radial temperature profile in the screw flight forms the basis for the 2D model. | The energy equation for the calculation of the radial temperature profile in the screw flight forms the basis for the 2D model. | ||
| - | $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v \nabla T\right) = \lambda \nabla^2 T + \tau \nabla v \tag{Equation 1}$$ | + | $$\rho c \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} + v \nabla T\right) = \lambda \nabla^2 T + \tau \nabla v \tag{55}$$ |
| A modification of the energy equation to match the existing open system, which exchanges the energy and the mass with the environment, | A modification of the energy equation to match the existing open system, which exchanges the energy and the mass with the environment, | ||
| Zeile 327: | Zeile 329: | ||
| $$-T \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_V \left(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) - \left(\sigma_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \sigma_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \sigma_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) $$ | $$-T \left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right)_V \left(\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) - \left(\sigma_{xx} \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial x} + \sigma_{yy} \frac{\partial v_y}{\partial y} + \sigma_{zz} \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial z}\right) $$ | ||
| - | $$-\left[\tau_{xy} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}\right) + \tau_{xz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\right) + \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\right]\tag{Equation 2}$$ | + | $$-\left[\tau_{xy} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial y}\right) + \tau_{xz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}\right) + \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_y}{\partial z} + \frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\right]\tag{56}$$ |
| The equation consists of five terms, which have the following meanings [[en: | The equation consists of five terms, which have the following meanings [[en: | ||
| Zeile 348: | Zeile 350: | ||
| * Normal stresses are also neglectable ($\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy} = \sigma_{zz} = 0$) | * Normal stresses are also neglectable ($\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy} = \sigma_{zz} = 0$) | ||
| - | With the help of the simplifying criteria the equation | + | With the help of the simplifying criteria the equation |
| - | $$\rho c v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} - \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\tag{Equation 3}$$ | + | $$\rho c v_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = -\frac{\partial \dot{q}_y}{\partial y} - \tau_{yz} \left(\frac{\partial v_z}{\partial y}\right)\tag{57}$$ |
| The sum of thermal conduction in the flight height and the energy of the dissipation results in the temperature rising lengthways in the canal, which is filled with polymer melt. | The sum of thermal conduction in the flight height and the energy of the dissipation results in the temperature rising lengthways in the canal, which is filled with polymer melt. | ||
| - | Under consideration of the Fourier thermal conductivity approach for the heat flow in direction of the flight height and the power flow law for non-newtonian flow behavior of polymer melt with the Arrehnius-approach, | + | Under consideration of the Fourier thermal conductivity approach for the heat flow in direction of the flight height and the power flow law for non-newtonian flow behavior of polymer melt with the Arrehnius-approach, |
| - | $$\rho c \bar{v}_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 e^{-\beta(T-T_0)}\tag{Equation 4}$$ | + | $$\rho c \bar{v}_z \frac{\partial T}{\partial z} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial y^2} + \left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 e^{-\beta(T-T_0)}\tag{58}$$ |
| To simplify the energy equation further, the dimensionless operating figures as described in [[en: | To simplify the energy equation further, the dimensionless operating figures as described in [[en: | ||
| - | $$Br = \frac{\left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 h^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K_{0T} v_0^{1+n} h^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}\tag{Equation 5}$$ | + | $$Br = \frac{\left(\overline{\tau\dot{\gamma}}\right)_0 h^2}{\lambda T_Z} \approx \frac{K_{0T} v_0^{1+n} h^{1-n}}{\lambda T_Z}\tag{59}$$ |
| - | $$Gz = \frac{c \rho \bar{v}_z h^2}{\lambda \Delta z} = \frac{c \rho h}{\lambda b \Delta z} \dot{V}\tag{Equation 6}$$ | + | $$Gz = \frac{c \rho \bar{v}_z h^2}{\lambda \Delta z} = \frac{c \rho h}{\lambda b \Delta z} \dot{V}\tag{60}$$ |
| - | $$\Theta = \frac{T - T_0}{T_Z}\tag{Equation 7}$$ | + | $$\Theta = \frac{T - T_0}{T_Z}\tag{61}$$ |
| - | $$\xi = \frac{\Delta y}{h}\tag{Equation 8}$$ | + | $$\xi = \frac{\Delta y}{h}\tag{62}$$ |
| - | $$\zeta = \frac{\Delta z}{l}\tag{Equation 9}$$ | + | $$\zeta = \frac{\Delta z}{l}\tag{63}$$ |
| During the geometric calculation of the Graetz- $Gr$ and Brinkmann-number $Br$ some twin screw-specific adjustments are made. For the ascertainment of the Graetz-number $Gr$ the flight height $h$ and the flight width $br$ are important. These two sizes are defined using the average flight height $\bar{h}$ and the flight width $b_{max}$ of the twin screw extruder. | During the geometric calculation of the Graetz- $Gr$ and Brinkmann-number $Br$ some twin screw-specific adjustments are made. For the ascertainment of the Graetz-number $Gr$ the flight height $h$ and the flight width $br$ are important. These two sizes are defined using the average flight height $\bar{h}$ and the flight width $b_{max}$ of the twin screw extruder. | ||
| Zeile 376: | Zeile 378: | ||
| For the Brinkmann-number $Br$ the viscosity $\eta$ is needed, this depends on the shear rate $\dot{\gamma}$ and is influenced by the geometry of the twin screw extruder. As there is no constant flight height $h$ in the canal, the average flight height $\bar{h}$ is used to calculate the average shear rate $\overline{\dot{\gamma}}$. Without considering the influence of the characteristics of the screw element (mixing elements, Shear elements etc.) [[en: | For the Brinkmann-number $Br$ the viscosity $\eta$ is needed, this depends on the shear rate $\dot{\gamma}$ and is influenced by the geometry of the twin screw extruder. As there is no constant flight height $h$ in the canal, the average flight height $\bar{h}$ is used to calculate the average shear rate $\overline{\dot{\gamma}}$. Without considering the influence of the characteristics of the screw element (mixing elements, Shear elements etc.) [[en: | ||
| - | $$\overline{\dot{\gamma}} = \frac{\bar{h}}{v_0}\tag{Equation 10}$$ | + | $$\overline{\dot{\gamma}} = \frac{\bar{h}}{v_0}\tag{64}$$ |
| The function for the calculation of the temperature in the melt-filled canal, assumes the following shape: | The function for the calculation of the temperature in the melt-filled canal, assumes the following shape: | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = \frac{1}{Gz} \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right]\tag{Equation 11}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} = \frac{1}{Gz} \frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} + \frac{Br}{Gz} \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right]\tag{65}$$ |
| It is not possible yet, to solve the, as the exponential term is dependent on the temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$. In the following equation the exponential term is partly linearized. | It is not possible yet, to solve the, as the exponential term is dependent on the temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$. In the following equation the exponential term is partly linearized. | ||
| - | $$\exp\left[-\beta(T - T_0)\right] = \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right] = c_1 - c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta\tag{Equation 12}$$ | + | $$\exp\left[-\beta(T - T_0)\right] = \exp\left[-\beta(T_Z \Theta)\right] = c_1 - c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta\tag{66}$$ |
| This linear equation divides the exponential term into two parts. The first part is dependent on the radial temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$ ($c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta$) and the second is dependent on $T$ or rather $\Theta$ and $c_1$. The two unknown parameters $c_1$ and $c_2$ are calculated in two equations, which approach the exponential function with a secant which lies between the average radial temperature of the previous section $T_0$ and the cylinder wall temperature $T_Z$. | This linear equation divides the exponential term into two parts. The first part is dependent on the radial temperature $T$ or rather $\Theta$ ($c_2 \beta T_Z \Theta$) and the second is dependent on $T$ or rather $\Theta$ and $c_1$. The two unknown parameters $c_1$ and $c_2$ are calculated in two equations, which approach the exponential function with a secant which lies between the average radial temperature of the previous section $T_0$ and the cylinder wall temperature $T_Z$. | ||
| Zeile 394: | Zeile 396: | ||
| In summary, the linearization with the Equation 10 produces the analytically solvable, simplified energy equation for the radial temperature (for $0 \leq \xi \leq 1$ and $0 \leq \zeta \leq 1$) [[en: | In summary, the linearization with the Equation 10 produces the analytically solvable, simplified energy equation for the radial temperature (for $0 \leq \xi \leq 1$ and $0 \leq \zeta \leq 1$) [[en: | ||
| - | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} - c_2 \beta T_Z Br \Theta = -c_1 Br\tag{Equation 13}$$ | + | $$\frac{\partial^2 \Theta}{\partial \xi^2} - Gz \frac{\partial \Theta}{\partial \xi} - c_2 \beta T_Z Br \Theta = -c_1 Br\tag{67}$$ |
| The presented differential equation was successfully solved with the marginal conditions of the constant cylinder temperature and a tempered screw in the elaboration of [[en: | The presented differential equation was successfully solved with the marginal conditions of the constant cylinder temperature and a tempered screw in the elaboration of [[en: | ||
| Zeile 400: | Zeile 402: | ||
| This can be done using the following equation and results in the ten data of the profile of the flight height. | This can be done using the following equation and results in the ten data of the profile of the flight height. | ||
| - | $$T_{0, | + | $$T_{0, |
| Finally the arithmetic mean is formed from the radial temperature data and the average canal temperature of the section is defined. Because of the step-by-step calculation in SIGMA the axial temperature curve can be calculated. | Finally the arithmetic mean is formed from the radial temperature data and the average canal temperature of the section is defined. Because of the step-by-step calculation in SIGMA the axial temperature curve can be calculated. | ||